Ex Nihilo Blue Talisman
By Fragranote Team · Research-based fragrance guide.
Scores and duration bands are estimates, not hands-on wear-test measurements. How to read our scores.
Ex Nihilo Blue Talisman scores 9/10 for longevity and performs best in Mild conditions.
Fragrance Notes
From the first impression to the lasting trail.
Top notes
The first impression
Heart notes
The character of the scent
Base notes
The lasting impression
Notes unfold and overlap differently on every skin.
Occasions & Seasons
Climate Performance
Avg 8.4 / 10Blue Talisman Eau de Parfum: keep it separate from Extrait
Research by Fragranote Team. Updated 11 September 2026. This is source-based analysis, not a hands-on wear test.
What the brand publishes
Ex Nihilo identifies this Blue Talisman as Eau de Parfum and credits perfumer Jordi Fernández. The official pyramid lists pear, bergamot, ginger and mandarin; orange blossom and Georgywood; then Ambrofix, Akigalawood and musks. These notes refer to the Eau de Parfum shown on the linked page, not automatically to another concentration bearing the Blue Talisman name.
What to check before buying
The pear opening and the modern woody-musky base are separate points to evaluate when sampling. Do not use the shared name to assume that Eau de Parfum and Extrait versions are interchangeable. Our similarity tool measures catalogue overlap; it cannot tell you whether a lower-priced option recreates the same balance on your skin.
How to interpret the scores
The scores, duration bands and climate guidance on this page are catalogue estimates. They are not independent test measurements. A note pyramid describes a scent, not ingredient quantities, allergens or a guaranteed order of evaporation. Price ranges are indicative and may vary by bottle size, retailer and market.
Sources and accountability
Ex Nihilo: official product listing (consulted September 2026). Facts above are attributed to that listing; buying guidance is Fragranote Team’s interpretation. Brand copy and product editions can change. Report a correction · Read our methodology.
